A Coach’s Perspective on Balks
This comment appeared originally as a comment but has now become its own post. Every day balks dominate the list of search terms that direct readers to our learning blog. For this reason, “Balk” now has its own category.
Dear Coach & Umpire Rob,
Thank you for taking time to share your game situation and not mentioning names or location. By doing so, you have presented an excellent learning opportunity. In turn, umpires involved in this game or any other game situation should not turn comments meant to help all of us learn into an argument.
The gray area surrounding the balk rule comes into play all too often. Is it a balk only if someone is deceived? Why do some interpretations allow for deception (ie. fake to third with direct throw to first without full disengagement from pitcher’s plate)? Do we or should we as umpires rule balks the same despite the level of play? Do the National Federation’s new rule interpretations for this season leave no room for judgement (ie. ball changing hands after engaging pitcher’s plate, etc.)? Is a change of direction, a complete stop? How long is the stop for a complete stop?
Here is Rob’s umpire/coach learning situation:
I am a coach and occasionally an umpire. Yesterday I was coaching a team of middle school boys in a city semi-final game and my son was on the mound. We were leading the game 5-4 with 2 out in the bottom of the seventh inning, a runner on third and 2 strikes on the batter……..the umpire calls “balk” and the tying run scores. I run out and the umpire was telling my son “you did not come to a complete stop”, my son and team were devastated. The next pitch was strike three. We lost in extra innings.
I handled it like a gentleman but feel my son and the team were dealt a long lasting blow that took away all their efforts of the previous two and half hours (not to mention the previous two and a half months that got us to that point).
My son is feeling like he let the whole team down.
The ump may have been technically correct but I don’t believe he served the game of baseball any justice by the timing of his call. I am still upset but know the game is over and the outcome won’t change. As a coach and an adult, I can deal with it but the boys and mostly my son, I want to find the words to best explain it all.
Kimball Comments:
Being a city semi-final game, I wonder whether there may have been a higher level umpire assigned who calls your described balk whenever he sees it. Unfortunately we often see this all too often in local sports. I support middle school regular season officials working middle school playoffs and championships for a wide variety of reasons.
In response to your personal frustration and emotion, I must first applaud you for acting like a gentleman and not blaming others for your team’s loss. This could not have been easy. You apparently modeled excellent behavior. However, I do question how long a this “lasting blow” will last. Players usually rebound much faster than coaches/parents as long as winning and losing and the true benefits of participation are shared throughout the season. Coaches are some of our most important teachers. The difficulty of your role was compounded exponentially by having your son not only on your team, but also on the mound at the time of incident.
Maybe the rule makers will better communicate how the balk rule should be interpreted in its umpire manual. Or, even better, local school leagues can work closely with local umpire associations to set their own ground rules for teaching proper pitching techniques as is done for some of the other sports.
Click on the title of this article or click on “Comment(s)” below to share your comments. Now the discussion continues!
Coach/Umpire Rob was certainly in a most difficult situation and I, too, applaud his restraint. I have two observations. Rob Curtis asks the right question when he muses “Did the balk deceive anyone? Did the runner do or not do something different that he would have had their been no balk?” If the answer to that question is “No” (and we are talking about middle school post season play), then I would question that umpire’s call. At the same time, it may have been one of those You Had To Have Been There situations and without all the facts, I may be off base by offering my opinion.
The second observation is that in order to provide first class officiating, an umpire must be familiar with the level of play he has been engaged to officiate. He must know the expections of the coaches and the players at that level, and he must be flexible in his officiating. Shawn makes a great suggestion when he advocates for the local leagues to work with the local umpire association to set their own ground rules for teaching proper teaching techniques.
Surely there are more of you out there with thoughts about the issue that Rob Armstsrong raised in his comment. It would be helpful to me for my own learning if you would click on “Comments” below and share them with us. We all become better umpires that way.
Keys to being a good “rules” umpire:
Know the rules
Know WHY the rule is there
Understand the situations that the rule is in place to prevent.
If you know one or two parts you’re not going to be a consistent umpire in any aspect of the rules not just balks.
I think we as a group don’t always have always thought out “WHY the rule is there” which makes it difficult to “understand the situations that the rule is in place to prevent.” What a great educational process it would be, when discussing a particular rule in this blog, if we articulated why we think the rule is there and then go on to the specific situation. Out of that would arise an understanding of the situations that the rule is in place to prevent. That is a big risk to take, but we only get better when we take risks. Thanks, Rob, for distilling out the keys to being a good “rules” umpire.
Of course we need to have enough baseball sense to know why the rule is a rule, but we must also understand that we are not the rule makers. If we try to understand the rules too intricately, we are setting course to interpret the rules. Blogging umpires and coaches may be swayed by peers’ interpretations. Umpires may make rulings based more upon the discussions here than on the official rules. We must accept the rulebook and its interpretations and respect the National Federation and NCAA Rules Committees.
Rules govern every minute of our game, but the participants under the guidance of good umpiring make or break the game. Good baseball and good umpiring together have the potential to teach so much more than baseball. Poorly played baseball, poor umpiring, or unsporting behavior does the game a great disservice.
Umpires, I think our time is best spent devloping our teamwork, communication, and coverage of game situations. When you learn how to cover play situations, you naturally focus on the rules around those situations. That’s how I came to understand the rules/game. Rules and the game are virtually one in the same, but you have to understand the game to make proper rulings. This umpiring gig is a challenging, but truly, fun experience thanks to baseball!
To jump quickly to another subject, umpiring is much more than standing around and watching a game (or arguing about why a rule is a rule). Let’s all move around some more. It might even keep us warm, dry, and in good physical condition during a cold, rainy spell. (I know this is not a very motivating pep talk, but I hope we all get the point.)
What I was attempting to say was the OBR is 86 pages. Interpretation manuals are hundreds of pages tell you how to apply those 86 pages or rules and guide our judgment as umpires.
The NFHS has their case book online bulletins to again guide our judgment.
There’s not a single rule that’s “black and white” they all involve judgment and situation awareness.
Here’s a situation that I had in a game.
Runners on First and Third one out.
Runner from third takes off for second, pitcher steps off the rubber and looks at the runner as he’s running pitcher throws the ball to the second basemen who’s about 25 feet from second base. The runner at the time the second basemen gets the throw is about a stride away from the second basemen. Runner gets tagged as he runs into the second basemen as he’s attempting to avoid and there’s nothing hard or anything. The contact causes the throw to the plate to be off target and the run scores.
Defensive coach comes out and wants interference called. I didn’t call interference on the play simply because the runner didn’t have a chance to avoid the second basemen by the time he stopped and was in the act of fielding the ball. The runner didn’t change his course to second base. Anyone call anything different?
Scary and as foolish as it sounds, most baseball rules and the resulting umpire rulings should be black or white if we wish to get common, consistent rulings. Of course, the knotty problems like the potential interference situation in your comment will always challenge our interpretations of the rules. Knotty problems are only a tiny percentage of all rulings as many of our rulings are not even noticed by the most discerning fans.
I personally believe rules committees should make many more interpretation each year, but rule makers may rightfully hesitate to change the game too much. If we look at this from another perspective, it may be best for the game not to have definitive answers for hundreds of crazy play situations. Most umpires probably do not want to spend a majority of their time dissecting rules.
Maybe the rulemaker gods believed in umpires and decided to trust umpires to do the right thing even if it might mean some inconsistencies!?! If I remember correctly, arbiters are meant to manage games and assure fair outcomes. Crazy plays generally make little difference in the big picture of who wins especially if we think in terms of league and state championships.
Hopefully the rule gods would also agree with me that learning to work as a team and work through challenges placed upon a team (including weird plays and inconsistent rulings) are some of the most important learning experiences that team sport participation provides.
Just trying to look at the same situation through different colored glasses! This is my slant and I welcome yours.